America's Ruling Class, Part 9

by BD Pisani ♦ 12 jul 2010

According to Dr. A.M. Codevilla, the only serious opposition to America's Ruling Party is coming not from establishment Republicans but from what might be called the Country Party -- and its vision is revolutionary. Part 9 -- Meddling and Apologies

No Difference In Party Elitists

Every so often you stumble across an opinion piece that, after reading several paragraphs, causes you to stop and consider the profundity of its message before absorbing more. So it was this week with an article in the July/August 2010 issue of The American Spectator (TAS).

Dr. Angelo M. Codevilla is professor of international relations at Boston University, Vice Chairman of the U.S. Army War College Board of Visitors, former U.S. Foreign Service Officer, and a Senior Fellow at The Claremont Institute. He recently published a lengthy essay entitled America's Regime Class -- And the Perils of Revolution which was just reprinted and re-titled in the aforementioned TAS. To paraphrase, Codevilla details how the elite have advanced in power and station as the nation has declined -- and what is now brewing as a result.

Since Dr. Codevilla essentially serves us up a pre-election symposium along with his dissection of prevailing elitism and the forces gathering in opposition, B2Journal considers it an American public service to share his notable effort here. Due to its prodigious length, it is offered in several sections -- posted as quickly as time permits. Those of you with stamina may read The Regime Class in its entirety in .pdf format. This is a must read for Tea Partiers and conservatives:

America's Ruling Class, And The Perils Of Revolution

Part 9 -- Meddling and Apologies

by Angelo M. Codevilla

America's Best And Brightest believe themselves qualified and duty bound to direct the lives not only of Americans but of foreigners as well. George W. Bush's 2005 inaugural statement that America cannot be free until the whole world is free and hence that America must push and prod mankind to freedom was but an extrapolation of the sentiments of America's Progressive class, first articulated by such as Princeton's Woodrow Wilson and Columbia's Nicholas Murray Butler. But while the early Progressives expected the rest of the world to follow peacefully, today's ruling class makes decisions about war and peace at least as much forcibly to tinker with the innards of foreign bodies politic as to protect America. Indeed, they conflate the two purposes in the face of the American people's insistence to draw a bright line between war against our enemies, and peace with non-enemies in whose affairs we do not interfere. That is why, from Wilson to Kissinger, the ruling class has complained that the American people oscillate between bellicosity and "isolationism."

Because our ruling class deems unsophisticated the American people's perennial preference for decisive military action or none, its default solution to international threats has been to commit blood and treasure to long term, twilight efforts to reform the world's Vietnams, Somalias, Iraqs and Afghanistans,"Rather, even as our ruling class has lectured, cajoled, and sometimes intruded violently to reform foreign countries in its own image, it has apologized to them for America not having matched that image -- their private image." believing that changing hearts and minds is the prerequisite of peace and that it knows how to change them. The apparently endless series of wars in which our ruling class has embroiled America, which have achieved nothing worthwhile at great cost in lives and treasure has contributed to defining it, and to discrediting it -- but not in its own eyes.

Rather, even as our ruling class has lectured, cajoled, and sometimes intruded violently to reform foreign countries in its own image, it has apologized to them for America not having matched that image -- their private image. Woodrow Wilson began this double game in 1919, when he assured Europe's peoples that America had mandated him to demand their agreement to Article X of the peace treaty (the League of Nations) and then swore to the American people that Article X was the Europeans' non negotiable demand. The fact that the US government had seized control of trans Atlantic cable communications helped hide (for a while) that the League scheme was merely the American Progressives' private dream. In our time, this double game is quotidian on the evening news. Notably, President Obama apologized to Europe because "the United States has fallen short of meeting its responsibilities" to reduce carbon emissions by taxation. But the American people never assumed such responsibility, and oppose doing so. Hence President Obama was not apologizing for anything that he or anyone he respected had done, but rather blaming his fellow Americans for not doing what he thinks they should do while glossing over the fact that the Europeans had done the taxing but not the reducing. Wilson redux.

Similarly, Obama "apologized" to Europeans because some Americans -- not him and his friends -- had shown "arrogance and been dismissive" toward them, and to the world because President Truman had used the atom bomb to end World War II. So, President Clinton apologized to Africans because some Americans held African slaves until 1865 and others were mean to negroes thereafter -- not himself and his friends, of course. So, in 2010 Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner apologized to Chinese diplomats for the state of Arizona's law that directs police to check immigration status. Republicans engage in that sort of thing as well: Former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev tells us that in 1987 then Vice President George W. Bush distanced himself from his own Administration by telling him, "Reagan is a conservative, an extreme conservative. All the dummies and blockheads are with him ..." This is all about"In sum, our ruling class does not like the rest of America." a class of Americans distinguishing itself from its inferiors. It recalls the Pharisee in the Temple: "Lord, I thank thee that I am not like other men ..."

In sum, our ruling class does not like the rest of America. Most of all does it dislike that so many Americans think America is substantially different from the rest of the world and like it that way. For our ruling class, however, America is a work in progress, just like the rest the world, and they are the engineers.

End of Part 9. Next, The Country Class

Review America's Ruling Class - Part 1 -- Introduction
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 2 -- The Political Divide.
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 3 -- The Ruling Class
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 4 -- The Faith
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 5 -- The Agenda: Power
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 6 -- Dependence Economics
Review America's Ruling Class - Part 7 -- Who Depends on Whom?

Review America's Ruling Class - Part 8 -- Disaggregating and Dispiriting

Hype and Chains for 112 more days.